Chapter 4

Ilaksh: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language

Chapter 4: Case Morphology

+ 4.1.1 Case as Indicator of Semantic Role

+ 4.1.2 Additional Semantic Roles

+ 4.3.12 Examples of Transrelative Cases in Use

4.3.13 Specialized Suffixes Used to Expand the Functionality of the Transrelative + Cases

+ 4.4.8 Examples of Possessive Cases in Use +

4.5.34 Examples of Associative Cases in Use

+ 4.6.16 Examples of Temporal Cases in Use

+ 4.7.7 Examples of Spatial Cases in Use

From 27c9f305310f2025ae34be905589613d5c1f47e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: uakci Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 02:23:27 +0200 Subject: 2004-en, 2004-ru, 2011-en --- 2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig | 2260 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 2260 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig (limited to '2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig') diff --git a/2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig b/2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..23cf3d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/2004-en/Chapter_4.html.orig @@ -0,0 +1,2260 @@ + + + + +Chapter 4 + + + + +

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Home	4 Case Morphology	9 Syntax
Introduction	5 Verb Morphology	10 Lexico-Semantics
1 Phonology	6 More Verb Morphology	11 The Writing System
2 Morpho-Phonology	7 Suffixes	12 The Number System
3 Basic Morphology	8 Adjuncts	The Lexicon

+
+
+

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In this chapter, we analyze one additional morphological category: + Case. Like the six categories analyzed in the previous chapter, and unlike + other languages, the category of Case applies to all formatives in Ilaksh, + i.e., to both nouns and verbs alike. However, the syntactical context in which + Case operates is sufficiently dissimilar for nouns and verbs to warrant separate + analysis. In this chapter, we will analyze the case morphology of nouns alone. + The use of Case with verbs will be analyzed in Section +5.2.

Anyone who has studied German, Latin, Russian, Classical Greek + or Sanskrit, is familiar with the concept of Case. Case generally refers to + a morphological scheme in which a noun, whether via internal mutation of its + phonemes or via affixes, shows what grammatical “role” it plays + in the phrase or sentence in which it appears. For example, in the English sentence It was me she saw, the use of the word ‘she’ as opposed + to ‘her’ and the use of ‘me’ as opposed to ‘I’ + distinguishes the subject of the sentence (the person seeing) from the object + of the verb (the one being seen). Similarly, in the German sentence Der + Bruder des Knaben sah den Mann (= ‘The boy’s brother saw the + man’), the words ‘der’, ‘des’ and ‘den’ + distinguish the subject of the sentence ‘brother’ (nominative case) + from the possessor ‘boy’ (genitive case) from the object ‘man’ + (accusative case).

The concept of “case” can extend far beyond the + notions of subject, object and possessor. Depending on the particular language, + there may be noun cases which specify the location or position of a noun, whether + a noun accompanies another or derives from another or is the recipient of another. + In general, noun cases in those languages which rely upon them often substitute + for what in English is accomplished using prepositions or prepositional phrases. + The process of adding affixes or changing the phonetic structure of a word in + order to show a noun in a particular case is known as declining a noun, and + the various permutations of a noun into its cases are known as its declensions.

There are 96 cases in Ilaksh, 72 of which correspond to noun cases found in Ithkuil. The remaining 24 cases are new and serve very specialized functions associated with the verbal category called Level. These 24 specialized cases will be discussed separately in Section 5.8 on Level.
+

+ + + + +

NOTE TO READERS FAMILIAR WITH ITHKUIL

For those readers familiar with the case morphology of Ithkuil, the 81 noun cases of that language have been consolidated to 72 cases in Ilaksh. Nine Ithkuil cases have either been eliminated or consolidated with other cases in Ilaksh; specifically:

The INHERENT case of Ithkuil has been eliminated and its function merged with the CORRELATIVE case.
The ADVERSATIVE case of Ithkuil has been eliminated and its function merged with the CONTRASTIVE case.
The SUPPOSITIVE case of Ithkuil has been eliminated and its function merged with the POSTULATIVE case.
The INTEGRAL case of Ithkuil has been eliminated and its function merged with the ORIGINATIVE case.
The POSITIONAL case of Ithkuil has been eliminated and its function merged with the CORRELATIVE case.

Additionally the PROLATIVE, PERLATIVE, PERVASIVE, and PERIPHERAL cases of Ithkuil have been eliminated; their functions are performed in Ilaksh via verbal formatives just like other spatial concepts (see Section 10.4).

+ + + + +

4.1 + SEMANTIC ROLE VERSUS POSITIONAL SLOT

In most languages, case operates at the surface structure level + of language to signify arbitrary grammatical relations such as subject, direct + object, indirect object. The deeper level of “semantic role” is + ignored in terms of morphological designations. The notion of semantic role + can be illustrated by the following set of sentences:

+
(1a) John opened the door with the key.
+ (1b) The key opened the door.
+ (1c) The wind opened the door.
+ (1d) The door opened.
+

In each of these sentences case is assigned based on “slot”, + i.e., the position of the nouns relative to the verb, irrespective of their + semantic roles. Thus the “subjects” of the sentences are, respectively, John, the key, the wind, and the door. Yet + it can be seen that, semantically speaking, these four sentences are interrelated + in a causal way. Specifically, Sentence (1b) results directly from sentence + (1a), and sentence (1d) results directly from either (1b) or (1c). We see that + the case of the noun ‘key’ in sentence (1a) is prepositional, while + in sentence (1b) it is the subject. Yet, the key plays the same semantic role + in both sentences: the physical instrument by which the act of opening is accomplished. + As for the noun ‘door,’ it is marked as a direct object in the first + three sentences and as a subject in the fourth, even though its semantic role + in all four sentences never changes, i.e., it is the noun which undergoes a + change in its state as a result of the act of opening. The noun ‘John’ + in sentence (1a) is marked as a subject, the same case as ‘key’ + in (1b), the ‘wind’ in (1c) and the ‘door’ in (1d), + yet the semantic role of ‘John’ is entirely different than the role + of ‘key’ in (1b) and different again from ‘door’ in + (1c), i.e., John is acting as the conscious, deliberate initiator of the act + of opening. Finally, the noun ‘wind’ in (1c), while marked as a + subject, operates in yet another semantic role distinct from the subjects of + the other sentences, i.e., an inanimate, blind force of nature which, while + being the underlying cause of the act of opening, can make no conscious or willed + choice to initiate such action.

The case structures of Western languages mark positional slot + (i.e., grammatical relations) only, and have no overt way to indicate semantic + role, thus providing no way of showing the intuitive causal relationship between + sets of sentences like those above. In Ilaksh, however, the case of a noun + is based on its underlying semantic role, not its syntactic position in the + sentence relative to the verb. These semantic roles reflect a more fundamental + or primary level of language irrespective of the surface case marking of nouns + in other languages. Thus Ilaksh noun declension more accurately reflects the + underlying semantic function of nouns in sentences. Consequently, the Western + grammatical notions of “subject” and “object” have little + meaning or applicability in Ilaksh grammar.

The following semantic roles are marked by noun cases in Ilaksh. + They correspond roughly to the “subjects” and “objects” + of Western languages:

AGENT: The animate, (and usually conscious + and deliberate) initiator of an act which results in another noun undergoing + a consequent change in state or behavior, e.g., ‘John’ in Sentence + (1a) above.

FORCE: An inanimate, unwilled cause of an + act such as a force of nature like ‘wind’ in Sentence (1c) above.

INSTRUMENT: The noun which functions as the + physical means or tool by which an act is initiated or performed, e.g., ‘key’ + in Sentences (1a) and (1b) above.

PATIENT: The noun which undergoes a change + in state or behavior as a result of an act initiated or caused by itself or + by another noun, e.g., ‘door’ in all four sentences above.

Additional semantic roles corresponding to subjects and objects + in Western languages exist in Ilaksh as overt noun cases. These include the + roles of ENABLER, EXPERIENCER, STIMULUS, RECIPIENT, and CONTENT, and are explained + below using the following set of sentences as illustrations.

+
(2a) Mary hits the children.
+ (2b) Mary entertains the children.
+ (2c) Mary sees the children.
+ (2d) Mary tells the children a story.
+ (2e) Mary wants children.
+

Examining these five sentences, we notice that the noun Mary + is in the subject slot in all of them and the children is the direct object + (except in the fourth sentence), even though the semantic roles of both nouns + are entirely different in each of these five sentences. Beginning with Sentence + (2a) we see that Mary is an AGENT which tangibly causes injury or pain to the + children who obviously function in the role of PATIENT. Thus (2a) is identical + to sentence (1a) in terms of the roles portrayed by the subject and direct object.

In Sentence (2b) however, Mary entertains the + children, there is a subtle distinction. At first we might consider Mary + an agent who initiates a change in the children (i.e., the fact that they become + entertained). But, in fact, the act of entertainment is not one whose result + (enjoyment by the audience) can be guaranteed by the party doing the entertaining. + In fact, the result of the act of entertainment is not Mary’s to determine, + but rather the children’s, based on whether they “feel” a + sense of enjoyment at experiencing Mary’s act. And so, Mary is more like + a patient here, not an agent, as she is undergoing a change in her state or + behavior (she is performing an attempt to entertain) which she herself has chosen + to initiate and undergo, yet the act has the potential to cause a resulting + change in the children, the success of this motivation to be determined by the + children, however, not Mary. Such a semantic role as Mary here is termed an + ENABLER. And how do the children make the decision as to whether they are entertained + or not (i.e., what is their semantic role?). Can the children deliberately or + consciously choose to feel a sense of enjoyment, or are they not themselves + unwilling “patients” to their own emotional reactions? In case grammar, + a party such as the children who undergo an unwilled experience are termed EXPERIENCERS. + Besides emotional reactions, such unwilled experiences include autonomic sensory + perceptions (e.g., parties that see or hear because their eyes were open and + pointed in a particular direction or who were within earshot of a sound), and + autonomic bodily reactions or responses as well as proprioceptive sensations + (e.g., coughing, sneezing, perspiring, feeling hot or cold, feeling pain, etc.).

This notion of EXPERIENCER is likewise illustrated by Sentence + (2c) Mary sees the children, in which the verb ‘see’ denotes + an automatic sensory experience, not a deliberately initiated action. In other + words, it is the nature of the sense of sight to function automatically whenever + a person is conscious and his/her eyes are open. The verb ‘see’ + does not necessarily imply a conscious or deliberately willed action of “seeing” + (as would be implied by the verb ‘to look [at]’). Therefore, the + “action” is automatic and uninitiated; it is, in fact, not an action + at all, but rather an experiential state which the person doing the seeing undergoes. + In other words, the person seeing is actually a kind of “patient,” + as it is he/she who undergoes the experience of (and physical or emotional reaction + to) the particular sight. Such undergoers of sensory verbs and other unwilled + states (e.g., emotional states or reactions, autonomic bodily reactions such + as sneezing, physical states of sensation such as being hot or cold, etc.) are + categorized in the role of EXPERIENCERS. And what of the children’s role + in sentence (2c)? Unlike the first three sentences, the children do not undergo + any action. Certainly the process of “being seen” by Mary does not + in itself cause a physical change or reaction of any kind in the entity being + seen. Nor can the children be analyzed as “initiating” the act of + sight, as they may be completely unaware that Mary is seeing them. As a result, + the children’s semantic role is merely that of STIMULUS, a neutral, unwitting + originating reason for the experiential state being undergone by the other noun + participant.

In Sentence (2d) Mary tells the children a story, + Mary is a patient who initiates the action which she herself undergoes, the + telling of a story. The children do not undergo an unwilled emotional, sensory, + or bodily reaction here, but rather are the passive and more or less willing + RECIPIENT of information, the role of an “indirect object” in Western + languages. The story, on the other hand, is merely a non-participatory abstract + referent, whose role is termed CONTENT.

The role of CONTENT also applies to the children in Sentence + (2e) Mary wants children, where they function as the “object” + of Mary’s desire. Since no tangible action is occurring, nor are the children + undergoing any result of change of state, nor need they be even aware of Mary’s + desire, they are, like the story in sentence (2d), merely non-participatory + referents. As for Mary’s role in (2e), the emotional state of desire, + being unwilled, self-activating, and subjectively internal, creates a situation + similar to an automatic sensory perception or autonomic body response; thus, + Mary’s role is again that of EXPERIENCER.

+ + + + +

4.2 MORPHO-PHONOLOGICAL + MARKERS FOR CASE

Case is shown in different ways in Ilaksh depending on + whether the case is being shown in conjunction with a formative or a personal + reference adjunct (explained in Section + 8.1). For nouns, case is shown by vocalic mutation of + the stem-vowel Vr. + The permutations of the ninety-six series of vocalic mutation correspond + to the 96 cases. The particular mutational patterns are given in the sections + below as each case is described.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

((VL)

(Cx

Vp))

(Cm)

(VxC)

(VF

(Cb))

[stress]

+ Case markers for personal reference adjuncts + will be shown later in Section +8.1.

We are now in a position to examine the different noun cases + in detail. We will start with the group of cases which correspond to “subjects” +and “objects” in Western languages.

+ + + + +

4.3 THE TRANSRELATIVE CASES

The Transrelative cases refer to eleven cases used to identify + nouns functioning as participants to a verb, what in Western grammatical terms + would be referred to as “subjects” and “objects” and + most likely marked as either nominative, accusative, or dative. It is these + cases which more or less correspond to the semantic roles identified in Sec. + 4.1 above. The eleven transrelative cases are the OBLIQUE, + ABSOLUTIVE, DATIVE, ERGATIVE, EFFECTUATIVE, INDUCIVE, AFFECTIVE, INSTRUMENTAL, + ACTIVATIVE, DERIVATIVE, and SITUATIVE. Following + are explanations of the function and usage of each case. Actual Ilaksh examples +of these cases in use are provided in Section 4.3.12.
+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.1

OBL

The Oblique Case

The OBLIQUE case is marked by Series + 1 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). As described above in Section 4.1.2, the OBLIQUE identifies the semantic role of CONTENT, whether it is something given to a + RECIPIENT, or the non-causal abstract content of an experiential state, e.g., + a memory recalled, something desired, something feared. It would thus be used + in translating sentences such as Sam gave me a book, The + child likes cereal. It is also the case associated with + existential identification, what in English would be the subject of the verb + ‘to be’ when referring to the intrinsic identity or static description + of a noun as in the English sentences That boy is blind or The house was built of wood. The OBLIQUE, + being the semantically most neutral case, is also the citation form of a noun + (i.e., the form in which the noun would be listed in a dictionary).

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.2

IND

The Inducive Case

The INDUCIVE case is marked by Series + 2 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The INDUCIVE identifies a noun which + undergoes a self-initiated action, i.e., the noun is a PATIENT of an agential + action in which the AGENT and the PATIENT are the same. Note that this does + not necessarily imply reflexive action (i.e., doing something to oneself). It + would be used in sentences such as The boy jumped, He sang, The dog barked all night, or She danced to the music, in which the party initiating and performing the action + are one and the same.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.3

ABS

The Absolutive Case

The ABSOLUTIVE case is marked by Series + 3 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). As described in Section 4.1.1 above, the ABSOLUTIVE identifies the semantic role of PATIENT of an agential action, where the agent-initiator + is a different party than the patient who undergoes the resulting action. Note + that in sentences with patient subjects, the agent or instrument of agency need + not be overtly expressed. Examples of English sentences translatable using the ABSOLUTIVE would be The boy hit the girl, + She forced him to do it, The bird fell from + the sky, The prisoner died during the gun battle.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.4

ERG

The Ergative Case

The ERGATIVE case is marked by Series + 4 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ERGATIVE identifies the semantic + role of AGENT, i.e., a noun which initiates a tangible action undergone by another + party (the PATIENT), as described in Section 4.1.1. + Note that sentences involving an ERGATIVE agent need not + overtly express the patient noun. Examples of English sentences translatable + using the ERGATIVE would be The boy + hit the girl, She forced him to do it, That murderer kills for fun.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.5

EFF

The Effectuative Case

The EFFECTUATIVE case is marked by Series + 5 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The EFFECTUATIVE identifies the noun + acting in the semantic role of ENABLER, as described in Section + 4.1.2 above. This is the noun which initiates a causal chain of events, + ultimately resulting in a final event. An example would be pulling out the plug + of a filled bathtub thereby causing it to empty. This case should therefore + be carefully distinguished from the ERGATIVE case. Ergatively + marked nouns imply that the action undergone by the patient is the same action + directly initiated by the agent, whereas EFFECTUATIVE nouns imply a chain or series of cause-and-effect actions. For example, in the + Ilaksh translation of the sentence The clown emptied the blood from the + tub, the clown could be marked either as an AGENT by means of the ERGATIVE case, or as an ENABLER using the EFFECTUATIVE case. The + former would mean the clown poured out the blood himself, while the latter would + mean he let it drain (i.e., by pulling the plug). Such case distinctions eliminate + the need for Ilaksh to have separate verbs for ‘to drain,’ ‘to + pour’ or ‘to empty.’ The Ilaksh verb used in translating + the sentence would simply mean ‘to remove.’

Note that the EFFECTUATIVE case is commonly used with the ENB affix + -V1.ls to show the degree or nature of the enabling cause. With this affix, sentences + can be produced which specify whether the enablement is via giving of consent + or permission, by persuasion, by subtle indirect influence, by removal of a + hindrance, or even by inaction.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.6

AFF

The Affective Case

The AFFECTIVE case is marked by Series + 6 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The AFFECTIVE denotes a noun whose + semantic role is that of EXPERIENCER, as described previously in Section + 4.1.2, the noun which undergoes a non-causal, non-initiated (and unwilled) + experiential state, whether internally autonomic in nature or as the result + of an external stimulus. Examples of such states would be automatic sensory + experience; autonomic bodily reactions such as yawning, sneezing, coughing, + blinking, itching, feeling sleepy, pain, feeling ill, feeling cold or warm; + automatic reactions to external stimuli such as shock, flinching, ducking, raising + one’s arms to avoid sudden danger; as well as any unwilled emotional state + such as love, hate, fear, anger, surprise, joy, wistfulness, shyness, regret, + anxiety, etc.

Example sentences requiring the use of the AFFECTIVE case would be The baby is coughing, The lightning startled her, Mortimer loves his vittles, Uncle + Davey slept till noon, My back itches me.

Note that if the experiential state is willfully brought about + by the noun undergoing it, the INDUCIVE case would be + used, since the noun is deliberately initiating an action in order to induce + the experiential state. For example, compare the sentence The children smiled with glee (marked using the AFFECTIVE) + with The children smiled on cue (marked using the INDUCIVE).

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.7

DAT

The Dative Case

The DATIVE case is marked by Series 7 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The DATIVE has two functions in Ilaksh. + Similarly to Western languages, it marks indirect objects of verbs of giving + and telling, i.e., the semantic role of RECIPIENT of a noun transferred via + an act of giving, donation, lending, or other transference of possession, or + the hearer to who something is said, told, recounted, etc, as described in Section + 4.1.2 above. Secondly, like some Western languages (e.g., Russian), Ilaksh + uses a dative construction in lieu of any verb ‘to have’ in reference + to possession or attribution. It would therefore be used in translating sentences + such as We're giving you a present, Jason lent a dollar to his sister, Please grant me a wish, The + student has three books, Those mountains have a mysterious + quality.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.8

INS

The Instrumental Case

The INSTRUMENTAL case is marked by Series + 8 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). As described previously in Section 4.1.1, + the INSTRUMENTAL denotes a noun which functions as the + INSTRUMENT or means utilized by an AGENT in accomplishing an action or bringing + about a state. It is usually translated by English ‘with.’ Examples + of usage would be She killed him with a knife, The man + tripped over my foot, The password got him + inside. The INSTRUMENTAL is also used to mark translations + of an inanimate “subject” noun when its logical function is as the + instrument of an unstated agent, e.g., compare I pressed the button with + my finger with My finger pressed the button, + both of which would be identical in Ilaksh except for the latter sentence’s + missing agent, I.

Note that the INSTRUMENTAL does not translate + ‘with’ in its meaning of ‘along with’ or ‘accompanied + by’ (see the COMITATIVE case below in Sec. + 4.5.20) as in She arrived with her father. Nor is it used to show + the resources or materials consumed in performing an act. For example, in the + sentence He cooks with tomatoes (see the COMPOSITIVE case in Sec. 4.5.3), it is not the tomatoes that cook + the food, therefore the INSTRUMENTAL would not be used, + whereas in He fueled the fire with wood it is the wood that fuels the + fire, thus requiring the INSTRUMENTAL case.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.9

ACT

The Activative Case

The ACTIVATIVE case is marked by Series + 9 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ACTIVATIVE identifies a noun engaged + in or subject to a mental or metaphysical state which, as a concurrent result, + creates a hypothetical, “unrealized” situation which can potentially + be made real by further action. Such unrealized situations can be illustrated + by the sentence Frank must go to Chicago, in which no actual travel + to Chicago has occurred and, in fact, may not occur. Similarly, in the sentence Mother needs to rest, no resting has yet occurred and may not. In both + sentences, the event which would “fulfill” the state described remains + an unrealized hypothetical, at least from the perspective of the speaker. Similar + hypothetical events or states are found in the sentences The students want + you to sing, Everyone expected you to laugh, or Joe will demand that I stay. + Note that many of these constructions in English involve the use of “modal” + verbs such as want, need, can, must, etc.

Notice that the subject of these English sentences (Frank, + Mother, the students, everyone, Joe) are functioning neither as AGENTS + nor PATIENTS, since the modal verbs of which they are the subject do not identify + as-yet actualized events, only states of unrealized potential. These subjects + are essentially EXPERIENCERS undergoing a mental or metaphysical state of wanting, + needing, obligation, expectation, hoping, wishing, being able to, etc. However, + such experiencers must be differentiated from would-be experiencers “within” + the hypothetical situation. For example, in the sentence Sam wants Shirley + to love him, it could become ambiguous if Sam and Shirley are both marked + as EXPERIENCERS using the AFFECTIVE case. Consequently, + Ilaksh uses the ACTIVATIVE case to mark the subject whose + mental or metaphysical state creates a concurrent hypothetical, as-yet unrealized + situation. All of the subjects in the example sentences from the previous paragraph + (i.e., Frank, Mother, the students, everyone, Joe) would be so marked. + In Section 6.1 we will see how the ACTIVATIVE is used in conjunction with a morphological + category for verbs termed Modality to create such hypothetical states and situations.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.10

DER

The Derivative Case

The DERIVATIVE case is marked by Series + 10 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The DERIVATIVE serves two functions + in Ilaksh. Firstly, it identifies an inanimate FORCE of nature (as described + in Sec. 4.1.1) or abstract causative situation which + causes a PATIENT noun to undergo an action, as in The wind blew down the door, or Fame threatened his freedom. + The use of the DERIVATIVE instead of the ERGATIVE or the EFFECTUATIVE denotes that such inanimate agential + forces or abstract enabling situations cannot consciously or willingly initiate + actions, but rather are merely circumstantial initiating causes. Therefore the + resulting act, event, or state is seen more as having derived from this force + or situation, as opposed to being willfully or consciously caused. In this function, + a noun in the DERIVATIVE can often be translated using + phrases such as ‘due to, owing to, on account of, because of, as a result + of.’ Nouns in the DERIVATIVE can also appear in + appositive constructions (i.e., in a noun-to-noun conjunction) where the noun + in the DERIVATIVE denotes the abstract cause or reason + for the other noun, e.g., the danger of fame, love’s heartache, wind song.

The second function of the DERIVATIVE case is to identify the non-agential, unconscious or non-deliberate STIMULUS + of an affective mental state, emotion, or autonomic sensory experience, as in The coffee smells good, I saw her today, + She hates that boy, Victor coughed from the gas, + We laughed at his jokes, That song makes me + cry. Ilaksh grammar views the stimulus of an experiential state as having + a similar role to that of an abstract circumstantial or situational cause (as + in the above examples); this explains why the DERIVATIVE case serves to indicate both functions.

+ + + + + + + +

4.3.11

SIT

The Situative Case

The SITUATIVE case is marked by Series + 11 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The SITUATIVE identifies a noun as + the background context for a clause. It is similar to the DERIVATIVE case immediately above, except it does not imply a direct causative relationship + between the background context and the act, condition, or event which occurs. + It is translatable into English by various circumlocutions, as shown in the + following examples:

+
Because of war, our planet will never + be able to join the Federation.
+ Given the presence of clowns, we must accept the corruption + of our children.
+ Using my plan, we will defeat the enemy.
+

+
Açnăt ukšüŭl xmè-ëla utaluëéx.                                                  LISTEN
+ IFL-‘give’-DEL/U/CSL/UNI +    FML-‘clown’-IND-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    + IFL-‘mother’-DAT
+ FML-‘written document’-OBL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-SIZ2/6
+ The clown gave mother a note.
+
+ Pšùlk gmìel  ŧŧöàläč.                                                                         LISTEN
+ IFL-‘cough’-PRX/M/CSL/DCT    IFL-‘child’-AFF-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘odor’-DER-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-QUA1/3
+ The child is coughing due to the awful smell.
+
Duňštëmsirxūiç přĕurn ukšŭilërz dà-it.                                   LISTEN
+ IFL-‘translative motion’-PRX/U/ASO/COH-AGN2/1-BOD1/1-FRC2/9    IFL-‘anger-based use of force ’-ERG-DEL/M/AGG/VAR    IFL-‘clown’-ABS-IMP2/1    IFL-‘a stone’-INS-DEL/U/CSL/UNI
+ The angry mob stoned the helpless clown to death.
+(Literally: trajected-by.hand-with.maximum.force-to.maximum.effect semi.cohesive.group.-affected.by.anger-acting.as.agent clown-as.helpless.target with-stones)
+

+ Stems/Roots for above examples:
+
çnă- ‘give’ < nă- ‘TRANSFER OF POSSESSION’
+ ukšŭ- ‘clown’ <kšŭ- ‘FOOL/BUFFOON’
+ àxme(la)- ‘mother’, gmè- ‘child’ < kmè- ‘FAMILY MEMBER’
+ utá- ‘written document ’ < tá- ‘WRITE/INSCRIBE/RECORD’
+ pšù- ‘cough’ < pšù- ‘RESPIRATORY PAROXYSM’
+ ŧŧà- ‘odor’ < ŧà- ‘SMELL/ODOR’
+ dū- ‘translative motion ’ < dū- ‘TRANSLATIVE MOTION’
+ dì- ‘a stone ’ < dì- ‘ROCK/MINERAL-BASED FIRMAMENT/GROUND ’
+ přĕ- ‘anger-based use of force’ < přĕ- ‘CONFLICT/ANGER-BASED USE OF FORCE ’
+
+
+

It should be noted that Ilaksh provides an array of suffixes specifically designed + to work in conjunction with nouns inflected into one of the Transrelative cases + to significantly expand their ability to specify the exact nature of the causal + relationships between participants to a verb in an Ilaksh sentence. These suffixes + include the Consent CNS suffix, the Reason RSN suffix, the Expectation XPT suffix, the Deliberateness DLB suffix, the Enablement ENB suffix, the Agency/Intent AGN suffix, and the Impact IMP suffix. These affixes are detailed in Section + 7.4.12 and discussed further in Section + 10.1.2.

+ + + + +

4.4 THE POSESSIVE CASES

Those Western languages which have possessive cases usually + have only one such case, often functioning in a vague and ambiguous way to show + varying types of relationships between two nouns. For example, notice the differing + relationships expressed by the possessive in the following English sentences:

+
the man’s hat = the hat belonging to him [alienable possession]
+ the man’s house = the house he legally owns [proprietary responsibility]
+ the man’s arm = part of his body [inalienable component]
+ the man’s brother = the brother related to him [genetic relationship]
+ the man’s happiness = he feels happy [affective experience]
+ the man’s rescue = he was or will be rescued [target of others’ + purpose]
+ the man’s gift = the gift is for him [benefaction]
+ the man’s gift = the gift is from him [source]
+ the man’s world = the world in which he lives [inherent subjective + association]
+ the man’s team = the team he is associated with [interactive + mutual association]
+ the man’s story = the story about him [topical reference]
+ the man’s painting = the picture he painted [creation/authorship]
+ the man’s command = his being a commander [role or function]
+

In many instances, the English possessive is totally ambiguous, + e.g., does ‘the man’s story’ mean the one he wrote or the + one about him? Regarding ‘the man’s rescue,’ did the man do + the rescuing or is he the one being rescued? Is ‘the man’s gift’ + one he is giving or receiving? Ilaksh is more exact in specifying the nature + of these relationships via case. Many of the above relationships are addressed + by the seven Possessive cases.

The Possessive cases make a distinction between alienable + versus inalienable possession or attribution, as well as distinguishing whether + the possession is inherent to the possessor or imposed or caused from without. + These distinctions are explained below. Like Western languages (and unlike many + American Indian and North Caucasian languages), the case marking is on the possessor + noun, not the possessed. The seven Associative cases are the POSSESSIVE, + PROPRIETIVE, GENITIVE, ATTRIBUTIVE, PRODUCTIVE, INTERPRETATIVE, and ORIGINATIVE. + Following are explanations of the function and usage of each case. Actual Ilaksh + examples of the cases in use are given in Sec. 4.4.8.

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.1

POS

The Possessive Case

The POSSESSIVE case is marked by Series + 12 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The POSSESSIVE is used to refer to + a noun which has alienable (i.e., removable or severable) possession of another + noun in the sense of having physical control or oversight of that noun, whether + by chance circumstance or deliberate manipulation. The two nouns are not in + any sense inherent parts of one another and the relationship between the two + can be theoretically or actually terminated by an outside force or influence, + or by decision of the possessor, usually by means of mere physical permanent + separation of the possessor and possessed nouns. The possessive would be used + to translate English phrases such as his coat (e.g., + the one he is wearing, regardless of whether he owns it or not), the + boy’s book (e.g., the one in his hand), Father’s chair (e.g., the one he happens to be sitting in, as in a restaurant).

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.2

PRP

The Proprietive Case

The PROPRIETIVE case is marked by Series + 13 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PROPRIETIVE identifies a noun having + alienable possession of another noun in the sense of quasi-permanent contextual + control, ownership or oversight, whether by societal recognition, social convention, + law, purchase or decree, which mere physical separation does not sever. The + two nouns are not in any sense inherent parts of one another, however the relationship + cannot be terminated except via an equally or more binding act, declaration, + convention, law, process, etc. Using the same English examples used with the POSSESSIVE above, we can analyze the connotative difference: his coat (i.e., the one he owns, regardless of whether + he is wearing it or not), the boy’s book (e.g., + the one he bought), Father’s chair (e.g., the + one assigned to him).

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.3

GEN

The Genitive Case

The GENITIVE case is marked by Series + 14 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The GENITIVE is used to refer to a + noun which has inalienable (i.e., unremovable, unseverable) possession of or + association with another noun in the sense of having that noun as an inherent + or intrinsic attribute, characteristic, physical part, or genetic (i.e., familial) + bond, e.g., my hand, the building’s doors, the child’s father, the essence of that + woman.

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.4

ATT

The Attributive Case

The ATTRIBUTIVE case is marked by Series + 15 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ATTRIBUTIVE is used to refer to + a noun which inalienably experiences the effects of, or otherwise has an affective + (see the AFFECTIVE case above) relationship with another + noun, either as a temporary or permanent attribute, characteristic, or experience, + whether physical or psychological, objective or subjective in nature. Examples: his pain, Mother’s guilt, the + child’s cough, Dorothy’s mood, Davey’s happiness, the teacher’s stubbornness, my needs.

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.5

PDC

The Productive Case

The PRODUCTIVE case is marked by Series + 16 vocalic mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PRODUCTIVE identifies the creator, + author or originator of another noun, e.g., the girl’s poem, the clowns’ plan, my statue (i.e., the one I sculpted).

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.6

ITP

The Interpretative Case

The INTERPRETATIVE case is marked by + Series 17 vocalic mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The INTERPRETATIVE identifies a noun + acting as the subjective interpretational context of another noun, that is the + noun by or through which another noun is subjectively interpreted or described, + as exemplified by the phrases Monet’s Paris, our world, life as seen by children.

+ + + + + + + +

4.4.7

OGN

The Originative Case

The ORIGINATIVE case is marked by Series + 18 vocalic mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ORIGINATIVE identifies a noun as + being the literal or figurative source of another, or which + is the native location, origin, or usual locational context for another. , e.g., the man’s story (i.e., the one he told), our gift (i.e., + the one we are giving), water from the river, the fruit of the tree, Fix the kitchen sink! (i.e. the one found in the kitchen), Desert rocks are so + beautiful (i.e., whether being spoken about rocks taken from the desert + or rocks still present in the desert), Northern women are +easy-going.

The ORIGINATIVE + should be distinguished from the ABLATIVE in Section 4.7.5 below, in that + the ABLATIVE position or path of motion away from, + whereas the ORIGINATIVE merely presents a locational context + as a means of description or to distinguish the noun from an otherwise similar +noun.

+
LISTEN
+
ŧàmskäč akkà’ul
+ IFL-‘gust of odor’-OBL-PRX/M/SEG/UNI-QUA1/3    IFL-‘woman’-OGN-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘woman giving off a bad odor’ or + ‘bad odor coming from/off the woman’ +
+
xxàl štuöl
+ IFL-‘thing seen’-OBL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘eagle’-ATT-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘what the eagle sees’
+
aptrēl ustūal
+ IFL-‘interior corner’-OBL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI     FML-‘room/chamber’-GEN-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘corner of a room’
+
átalňa gmeäàl
+ IFL-‘page of writing’-OBL-DEL/M/SEG/COA    IFL-‘male child ’-POS--DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘the boy's book’ [i.e., the one he has in his immediate possession, not one he necessarily owns]
+
+ uvażgă  ukšë-üŭl
+ FML-‘job/employment’-OBL-PRX/M/CST/COA     FML-‘clown’-PRP-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘the clown's job’
+

+Stems/Roots for above examples:
+
ŧà- ‘gust of odor’ < ŧà- ‘SMELL/ODOR’
+ kkà- ‘woman’ < kà- ‘PERSON’
+ xxà- ‘something seen/a sight ’ < xà- ‘VISION/SIGHT’
+ štu- ‘eagle’ <štu- ‘EAGLE’
+ aptrē- ‘interior corner ’ < prē- ‘ANGULAR VERTEX/CORNER’
+ ustū- ‘room/chamber’ < stū- ‘HOLDING AREA/ENCLOSURE’
+ áta(la)- ‘page of writing’ < tá- ‘WRITE/INSCRIBE/RECORD’
+ agmè- ‘male child’ < kmè- ‘FAMILY MEMBER’
+ uvă- ‘job/employment’ < vă- ‘EFFORT/LABOR’
+ ukšŭ- ‘clown’ <kšŭ- ‘FOOL/BUFFOON’
+

+

+

+ + + + +

4.5 THE ASSOCIATIVE CASES

The Associative cases refer to a large group of cases which + modify a noun to show that it has some relationship to another, usually adjacent + noun or that it functions in an adverbial relationship to a verb. Most of these cases correspond to relationships in which, in English translation, + we find two nouns together in apposition or as a compound noun, as in cat + box, schoolbook, peace march, mountain man, etc., or joined by the word + ‘of’ in a non-possessive relationship, e.g., box of coins, dreams + of youth, sounds of laughter, or as a modifier of a verbal phrase. Following + are explanations of the function and usage of each case. Actual Ilaksh examples + of the cases in use are given in Sec. 4.5.34 .

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.1

PAR

The Partitive Case

The PARTITIVE case is marked by Series + 19 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). When used in conjunction with another noun, the PARTITIVE indicates a quantitative or content-to-container relationship between the two + nouns, e.g., a cup of coffee, a box(ful) of books, + a train(load) of refugees. When used alone, it signifies + that the context of the phrase or sentence involves only a portion of the noun, + rather than the whole noun, e.g., I ate some bread, Pour (some) water down my back.

The PARTITIVE is also used to mark a + noun qualified by a specific number, e.g., three boxes, + two clowns, twenty words. This usage + is analyzed in detail in Chapter + 12, where we will see that, in Ilaksh, numbers are formatives (i.e., + full nouns and verbs), not adjectives as in Western languages. Additionally, + a noun qualified by a number is not pluralized. In other words, one does not + say ‘three boxes,’ but rather “a trio of a box” or perhaps + more eloquently, “a box trio.”

The PARTITIVE case is also used in constructing + words for Ilaksh numbers beginning with two hundred. This is also detailed + in Chapter + 12 on enumeration.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.2

CRS

The Contrastive Case

The CONTRASTIVE case is marked by Series + 20 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONTRASTIVE identifies a distinguishing + characteristic of another noun, i.e., that feature which distinguishes it from + other possible candidates within the given context. It would be used in translating + phrases such as the green bottle (e.g., as opposed + to the blue one); the science text (e.g., versus the + religious text); my statue (i.e., a statue of me); I want your recipe for stew, not soup; + Don’t worry, it’s a pet snake. It also serves to indicate a noun which + has been replaced by another or for which another noun has been substituted. + In verbal frame adjuncts it identifies the situation which had been expected + in contrast to what actually takes place. This is translatable by the English + phrases ‘instead of’ or ‘as opposed to,’ or specialized uses of ‘not,’ e.g., Instead + of rain, it snowed; They hired her as a cook, as opposed to +a maid. That's sugar, not salt.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.3

CPS

The Compositive Case

The COMPOSITIVE case is marked by Series + 21 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The COMPOSITIVE identifies a noun as + being the literal or figurative substance or component(s) of which another is + made, composed, formed, built or comprised. Example of usage would be That + statue was carved out of marble, She owns three gold(en) coins, We were caught in a web of lies, I use a wooden ladder, It was a house of cards, Three suits comprise his wardrobe, Joe detests styrofoam cups.

The COMPOSITIVE is also used in conjunction + with verbs to identify the material(s) or resources used up or consumed in performing + or undertaking an activity. Examples of this usage would be She likes to + cook with tomatoes, He reads by candle(light), + That child goes through four sets of clothes a day, My uncle + satisfied his sweet tooth with three chocolate bars.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.4

PRD

The Predicative Case

The PREDICATIVE case is marked by Series 22 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PREDICATIVE identifies a noun which + constitutes the non-causal basis, foundation, sustenance (literally or figuratively), + or required existential condition for another noun or clause, translatable by + the phrases ‘based (up)on,’ ‘dependent (up)on’ or ‘relying + on.’ Examples of use are a book dependent on a publisher, + a man relying on charity, laws based in reason, + Can success supported by murder be sustained?

The PREDICATIVE should be distinguished + from Transrelative cases such as the DERIVATIVE or INSTRUMENTAL, + in that the PREDICATIVE does not denote a cause, merely + the sustaining entity on which another depends, e.g., it would not be used to + translate anxiety based on terror, as the anxiety does not ‘rely’ + or ‘depend’ on terror, but rather is caused by it. Similarly, in + the phrase an attitude fueled by greed, the attitude derives from or + results from greed, but is not relying on it.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.5

MED

The Mediative Case

The MEDIATIVE case is marked by Series + 23 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The MEDIATIVE indicates the physical, + psychological, or figurative medium through which another noun or event takes + place. It would be used in translating phrases or sentences such as a radio announcement, arrival by water, a letter bomb, air mail, achieving ecstasy through sex, I + showed her my love with chocolate. It should be distinguished + from the INSTRUMENTAL case (see Section 4.3.8 above), + which signifies the actual instrument or physical means used to accomplish a + causative action. For example, in the sentence Call him on the phone!, + translating the phrase on the phone into the INSTRUMENTAL case would signify ‘Use the phone (i.e., the one in the room) to call + him,’ whereas inflection into the MEDIATIVE case + would mean ‘Call him via the medium of telephony.’

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.6

APL

The Applicative Case

The APPLICATIVE case is marked by Series + 24 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The APPLICATIVE identifies a noun which + represents the purpose for which another noun is to be utilized in a given instance. + As such, it usually translates English ‘for’ when meaning ‘for + the temporary or incidental use/purpose of.’ Examples of usage would be a cup for coffee (i.e., a cup being used incidentally to hold coffee), a box for tools (i.e., the box is only temporarily being used to hold + tools), a room for changing. Note that the use of the APPLICATIVE can extend to usages beyond English ‘for,’ as in a “weapon” + cat = ‘a cat used as a weapon,’ or a “projectile” + book = ‘a book used as a projectile.’

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.7

PUR

The Purposive Case

The PURPOSIVE case is marked by Series + 25 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PURPOSIVE identifies a noun which + characterizes or defines the purpose of, or reason for, another noun. The PURPOSIVE is subtly distinct from the APPLICATIVE above, in that + the latter names the actual use to which a noun is put on a given occasion or + in given context, whereas the PURPOSIVE defines another + noun’s general function or primary reason for being, outside of any contextual + instance, i.e., what the noun is used for all the time (or at least its intended + use). It generally translates English ‘as,’ ‘of’ or + ‘for’ when meaning ‘for the purpose of’ or alternately + an English noun-noun expression or a compound noun. Examples of usage would + be a coffee cup, a toolbox, a litter box, a trashcan.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.8

CSD

The Considerative Case

The CONSIDERATIVE case is marked by Series + 26 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONSIDERATIVE identifies a noun + as the delimiting or defining context in which an act, state or event occurs + or is considered. Thus, it translates English terms such as ‘according + to,’ ‘pursuant to,’ ‘as per,’ ‘in the opinion + of.’ Examples of usage would be In my opinion he’s + a coward; He’s leaving town as per orders from the court; + You were arrested pursuant to law; According to our + teacher, humans are descended from apes.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.9

ESS

The Essive Case

The ESSIVE case is marked by Series 27 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ESSIVE identifies the role or name + by which a noun is known or contextually identified. It translates English ‘as’ + in the sense of naming or reference to the a nouns functional identity. It would + be used in translating the English sentences They called him a clown, + The woman entered the club as an equal of any man, We consider + you our only hope.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.10

ASI

The Assimilative Case

The ASSIMILATIVE case is marked by Series + 28 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ASSIMILATIVE identifies a noun used as + a context for analogy or metaphorical comparison to either another noun or a + verb. Thus, it translates English ‘like’ or ‘as’ in + the sense of comparison or analogy between one thing and another. Examples of + usage are She sings like a bird, As children they + seemed to me.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.11

FUN

The Functive Case

The FUNCTIVE case is marked by Series + 29 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). It functions similarly to English adverbs ending in -ly or the adverbial use of with, identifying the manner in which an action, + event, or state occurs or exists. More exactly, it identifies a noun used to + characterize the manner of the act, state, or event, translatable most accurately + by the phrase ‘in a manner characterized by….’ Examples would + be: She dances gracefully (i.e., in a manner characterized + by grace), The boys ate with gusto, That clown is speaking nonsense, Father speaks with such fortitude.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.12

TFM

The Transformative Case

The TRANSFORMATIVE case is marked by + Series 30 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The TRANSFORMATIVE identifies the outcome + or final state of a process, often translatable by ‘to,’ ‘until,’ + or ‘into’ in the sense of reaching a final state after having undergone + some transformation. Example usages would be The house burned to + ashes, The clown reached a state of tranquility, The + clowns will turn our children into slaves, Her father drank + himself to death.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.13

REF

The Referential Case

The REFERENTIAL case is marked by Series + 31 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The REFERENTIAL identifies a noun functioning + as the general referent of the verb, translating such English terms as ‘about,’ + ‘regarding,’ ‘concerning,’ ‘in regard to,’ + ‘in reference to,’ ‘pertaining to,’ or ‘as for.’ + Examples of use would be a song of love; As for + those books, burn them!; Let’s talk about clowns; + His attitude toward women.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.14

CLA

The Classificative Case

The CLASSIFICATIVE case is marked by + Series 32 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CLASSIFICATIVE identifies a noun + as a basis for arranging, sorting, classifying, or counting, translating various + English prepositions and phrases used for this purpose. Example of usage are Place them in groups of three, The workers arranged the + tables in rows, He lay down lengthwise, Can + you count by fives?, I will sort them by color.

The CLASSIFICATIVE is also used to identify + a noun considered in consecutively recurring increments as a means of describing + the manner of an event. This is usually in conjunction with nouns denoting time + periods, but can be used with any concrete noun to describe the repetitive nature + of an event. Examples would be Month by month, their departure + crept closer; Year after year, I see more and more clowns; Day in, day out, he’s always working; + The fertilizer factory keeps rolling them out, bag upon bag; Patient by patient, the nurse administered injections.

Note that the CLASSIFICATIVE would not + be used to describe a noun other than adverbially, e.g., it would not be used + to translate the sentence One bomb after another fell on the city. + Such a construction would utilize a suffix indicating sequential instantiations + of the noun (see Sec. + 7.4.4).

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.15

CNV

The Conductive Case

The CONDUCTIVE case is marked by Series + 33 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONDUCTIVE identifies the meaningful + or relevant context of another. It can be thought of as conveying the relationship + signified by the expressions ‘having to do with,’ ‘as it pertains + to,’ or ‘considered within the context of.’ Examples of English + phrases translatable using this case are a circus clown, + a mountain man, a feeling of loneliness, the Mafia’s world, a realm of fear, my life achievement, childhood memories, Let’s + discuss the morality of war.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.16

IDP

The Interdependent Case

The INTERDEPENDENT case is marked by + Series 34 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The INTERDEPENDENT identifies a noun + which has a coordinated, tandem, complementary or mutually dependent relationship + with another. The relationship between the two nouns can be thought of as reciprocal + in nature, i.e., each noun implies the other or needs the other to exist within + it’s natural context, e.g., the students’ teacher, + an army general, the blood in my veins, the + driver of the truck, the nation’s leader, his team (i.e., the one on which he’s a member). Note that this case + does not imply a part-whole dependency as with the GENITIVE case above, e.g., it would not be used to translate the book’s pages, + or the leaves of a tree.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.17

BEN

The Benefactive Case

The BENEFACTIVE case is marked by Series + 35 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The BENEFACTIVE identifies a noun for + whose sake or benefit an action or event occurs or is done. As such, the BENEFACTIVE is similar to the DATIVE, except that the BENEFACTIVE implies a strong emphasis on the fact that the noun is more than simply the + recipient or target of a dative action, but rather benefits in a tangible or + consequential way from the action or event. It is usually translated by English + ‘for’ in the sense of ‘for the sake (i.e., benefit) of.’ + Examples of usage are a toy for the children, We threw him a party, Go to the teachers’ + lounge.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.18

TSP

The Transpositive Case

The TRANSPOSITIVE case is marked by Series + 36 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The TRANSPOSITIVE implies substitution + of one noun for another. It translates English ‘for’ in the sense + of ‘on behalf of,’ ‘in place of,’ or ‘instead + of’ (i.e., ‘as a substitution for’). Examples of usage are The boss made the speech for me, She went up into the attic for her brother (i.e., so he wouldn’t have to).

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.19

CMM

The Commutative Case

The COMMUTATIVE case is marked by Series + 37 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The COMMUTATIVE translates English + ‘for’ in the sense of ‘in exchange for’ as in You + paid too much money for that dress, She kills for thrills.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.20

COM

The Comitative Case

The COMITATIVE case is marked by Series + 38 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). Similar to its counterpart in Uralic languages such as Finnish + or Estonian, the COMITATIVE translates the English ‘with’ + in its meaning of accompaniment (i.e., ‘along with’) as in The + child went with the clown to the party. Like English ‘with,’ + the COMITATIVE does not imply that the conjoined noun + is necessarily engaged in the same activity or associated with the same verb + as the head noun. For example, in the sentence My father was walking with + a loaf of bread, the loaf of bread is not considered to be itself walking.

It should be noted, however, that the COMITATIVE is not used to imply mutually interactive or reciprocal activity between two + nouns. Thus it would not be used in translating the sentences They danced + with each other or Mother wants to talk with you. These would + be translated using the RECIPROCAL valence of the verb, + explained in Section 6.2. + This distinction is illustrated even more clearly by comparing the following + two sentences; the first would be translated using the COMITATIVE, + the second would not: This man fought with my father (e.g., alongside + him during the war) versus This man fought with my father (e.g., they + had a fight with each other).

Note also that the COMITATIVE is not + used to indicate instrumentality (English ‘with’ meaning ‘by + means of’). Thus, it is not used to translate sentences such as I + cut the meat with a knife. As previously discussed in Section + 4.3.8, instrumentality is indicated by use of the INSTRUMENTAL case. Likewise, it is not used to identify the resources or material(s) consumed + in undertaking an act, as in He catches his fish with worms for which the COMPOSITIVE case is used.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.21

CNJ

The Conjunctive Case

The CONJUNCTIVE case is marked by Series + 39 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONJUNCTIVE translates English + ‘with’ in its meaning of ‘in conjunction with,’ i.e., + to indicate that the noun is engaged in the same activity or a complementary + activity as the conjoined noun. It should be distinguished from the COMITATIVE above, which indicates mere accompaniment. For example, in the walking with + a loaf of bread example from above, it would be incorrect to use the CONJUNCTIVE case because that would signify the bread was walking, too. To further illustrate + the usage, consider the sentence I’m with the brigade. Translating + ‘brigade’ using the COMITATIVE would mean + that ‘I’ve come along (e.g., drove) with the brigade to the scene,’ + while using the CONJUNCTIVE would mean ‘I’m + a member of the brigade.’ Additional examples where the CONJUNCTIVE would be used are They skate with the best team, That teacher works well + with children.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.22

UTL

The Utilitative Case

The UTILITATIVE case is marked by Series + 40 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The UTILITATIVE identifies a noun in + the process of being utilized. This corresponds to the use of English ‘with’ + where it refers to actual use in progress as in A man with a gun ran into the room. It should be distinguished from the INSTRUMENTAL (see Sec. 4.3.8) in that the latter indicates the implement + used to accomplish an action, while the UTILITATIVE identifies + a noun in use, but does not imply that the noun was the implement used to accomplish + a stated action. For example, compare the sentence The man with + an umbrella was pushing a stroller in the rain (UTILITATIVE) + with The man pushed a stroller in the rain with an umbrella (INSTRUMENTAL). The first sentence implies the man was + pushing a stroller with one hand while holding an open umbrella against the + rain, whereas the second sentence has him using the umbrella to push the stroller. + Another way to translate the UTILITATIVE would be to use + an English gerundial construction as in A gun-wielding man ran into the room or An umbrella-toting man pushed + a stroller in the rain.

Besides the INSTRUMENTAL, the UTILITATIVE should likewise be distinguished from the COMITATIVE case + above, in that the COMITATIVE merely indicates accompaniment, + while the UTILITATIVE indicates use in progress. For example, + the sentence Go sit next to the girl with the book, + if translated using the COMITATIVE would merely identify + a girl who has a book in her visible possession, while with the UTILITATIVE it would mean the girl is actually engaged in reading the book.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.23

ABE

The Abessive Case

The ABESSIVE case is marked by Series + 41 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ABESSIVE is essentially the opposite + of the COMITATIVE, translating the English ‘without’ + or ‘-less’ in the sense of ‘unaccompanied by’ or ‘not + having’ as in a day without rain or a treeless plain. As noted in the next section below on the CONVERSIVE case, it is not used to translate ‘without’ when + it means ‘unless one has,’ referring to a hypothetical exception + to a potential outcome as in I can’t go on without love.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.24

CVS

The Conversive Case

The CONVERSIVE case is marked by Series + 42 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONVERSIVE is used in conjunction + with hypothetical or potential contexts to identify a hypothetical exception + to a potential outcome or an actual circumstance which alters or has altered + a potential outcome. This translates two different ways into English. Where + it indicates an exception to a hypothetical situation, it is translated by the + conjunction ‘unless’ in verbal contexts, and by the preposition + ‘without’ for nouns (note that ‘without’ in this sense + does not correspond to its usual ABESSIVE usage in Sec. + 4.7.1 above). If applied to a real or actual situation, it is translatable by + such expressions as ‘but for,’ ‘if not for,’ ‘if + it wasn’t for,’ or ‘if it wasn’t on account of.’ + Example of usage: Without peace, this society is doomed; If not for the rain, we would have had a good time.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.25

COR

The Correlative Case

The CORRELATIVE case is marked by Series + 43 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CORRELATIVE is used to indicate + an abstract relationship, association, or conjunction between a noun and another + noun or verb, including subjective, contextual, metaphorical, or symbolic associations. It translates general phrases such as ‘relative to,’ + ‘in relation to,’ ‘in correlation with,’ ‘in association + with,’ etc. It would be used in translating phrases such as career goals, the soup of the day, the direction of that road, + The elapsed time relative to the distance determines the winner, + Our next topic is sex and (or in) art (i.e., the relationship between art and sex). Additional examples are years of wonder, + the Clown Planet, life blood, city of + evil. Note that the CORRELATIVE case would often be used to translate constructions for which English often + uses an adjective, e.g., spatial coordinates, the political economy, a dangerous situation (i.e., a situation + characterized by danger).

When used in contexts involving directional motion or spatial positioning is, + the CORRELATIVE signifies the directional orientation or position of one + noun relative to another, i.e., a noun relative + to whose position in space another noun is being described for purposes of spatial + orientation. To an English-speaker, the function of this case makes greater + sense once one realizes that, in Ilaksh, most one-to-one spatial relationships + are described by verbs, not prepositions, e.g., ‘to be situated on the + right,’ ‘to move beneath,’ etc. Consequently, this use of the CORRELATIVE case can be thought of as expressing the phrase ‘relative to.’ Examples + of how it would be used are I’m standing four feet north of + the desk, The one hanging above the boxes looks fresh, + It lies at a 30° angle relative to the tree, He turned his back on me, + The upstairs bedroom faces the yard, It’s alongside the + desk (i.e., its lateral surface is oriented toward the desk).

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.26

DEP

The Dependent Case

The DEPENDENT case is marked by Series + 44 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The DEPENDENT translates the English + phrase ‘depending on’ signifying a noun as the contingency on which + the reality of a main clause depends. Examples of usage would be Depending + on the rain, we’ll go for a picnic; She may show up, depending + on her attitude.

The DEPENDENT should be distinguished + from the PREDICATIVE case in Sec. + 4.5.4, in that the former denotes contingency, while the PREDICATIVE denotes reliance.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.27

PVS

The Provisional Case

The PROVISIONAL case is marked by Series + 45 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The identifies the noun, situation, or circumstance on which + the factuality of the main clause of the sentence depends, i.e., the required + condition(s) which must come into existence for the situation described in the + main clause to occur. This is translatable by such English phrases as ‘provided + (that),’ ‘on condition of,’ ‘only in case of,’ + or ‘but only if,’ e.g., Provided [there’s] food, + I will attend the meeting; We will fight only in case of war.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.28

PTL

The Postulative Case

The POSTULATIVE case is marked by Series + 46 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The operates somewhat similarly to the PROVISIONAL above, except that the POSTULATIVE implies a causal or + consequential relationship (not merely a circumstantial one) between the pre-condition(s) + and the circumstances of the main clause. Specifically, it identifies the noun, + situation, or circumstance whose factuality has not yet come into existence, + but, should it come into existence, will result in the consequence indicated + by the main clause. This is translatable by English ‘if,’ or ‘in + case of.’ Note that it does not translate English ‘if’ where + it means ‘whether’ as in I don’t know if it’s warm + enough, i.e., where the clause is meant only to convey uncertainty or optionality + (but not a causal relationship between a potential condition and its consequences). + Examples of usage: If [there’s] snow, I’m not + going out; In case of fire, flee; If friend, + welcome them, if foe, kill ’em.

The example below is offered to further distinguish the use of the POSTULATIVE case + from the PROVISIONAL case above:

PROVISIONAL: We’re packing + umbrellas, but only in case of bad weather (i.e., umbrellas + will not be packed unless the weather is actually bad).
+ POSTULATIVE: We’re packing umbrellas in + case of bad weather (i.e., the umbrellas are being packed in preparation +for the possibility of bad weather).
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.29

DFR

The Deferential Case

The DEFERENTIAL case is marked by Series + 47 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The DEFERENTIAL translates the English + phrases ‘out of respect for,’ ‘for the sake of,’ or + ‘in deference toward,’ identifying the noun to which deference is + paid within the context for an act, condition, or event. Examples of usage would + be He remained silent for her sake, They went on with the + ceremony out of respect for the families, They dressed in robes because of tradition.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.30

CON

The Concessive Case

The CONCESSIVE case is marked by Series + 48 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONCESSIVE case identifies a noun, + situation, or circumstance which gives rise to an expectation of a certain result + which, in fact, does not occur. This can be translated by various English prepositions, + conjunctions, or phrases such as ‘despite,’ ‘in spite of,’ + ‘notwithstanding,’ ‘although,’ ‘regardless of,’ + ‘no matter what,’ etc. Examples of usage: In spite of + his stupidity, he passed the test; The law notwithstanding, + I will stand my ground; No matter how ignorant (they may be), + they are welcome, Although foreigners, we will let them attend + the meeting.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.31

EXC

The Exceptive Case

The EXCEPTIVE case is marked by Series + 49 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The EXCEPTIVE indicates a noun, situation, + or circumstance which is an exception, or is exempted or excluded from the main + clause, translatable by English ‘except (for),’ ‘but (not),’ + or ‘excluding.’ Examples of usage: She loves everybody except + clowns; I like all animals, excluding dogs; He eats + almost anything but (not) spinach.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.32

AVR

The Aversive Case

The AVERSIVE case is marked by Series + 50 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The AVERSIVE identifies a noun as a + source or object of fear and/or avoidance. With nouns, it translates expressions + such as ‘for fear of,’ ‘in order to avoid,’ or ‘in + avoidance of.’ With verb phrases (i.e., case-frames; see Sec. + 5.2) , it would translate English ‘lest.’ Examples of usage + are She finished her plate for fear of my wrath, I traveled + by night to avoid the sun.

+ + + + + + + +

4.5.33

CMP

The Comparative Case

The COMPARATIVE case is marked by Series + 51 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The COMPARATIVE identifies a noun being + compared and contrasted to another. It translates such expressions as ‘as + compared to,’ ‘as opposed to.’ With verbal case-frames (see Sec. 5.2) it would translate as + ‘whereas’ or ‘while’ (in its synonymous usage to ‘whereas’). + Examples are She chose the red one as opposed to the blue one, + Sam drives a van as compared to Joe, who prefers a truck.

+
LISTEN
+
ukya’al vloliêxek
+ FML-‘coffee bean drink’-PAR-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘contain via gravity/basin’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-SIZ2/3-SSD1/2
+ ‘cup of coffee’
+
ukya’ül vloliêxek
+ FML-‘coffee bean drink’-APL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘contain via gravity/basin’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-SIZ2/3-SSD1/2
+ ‘cup being used for coffee’
+
ukyä’ël vloliêxek
+ FML-‘coffee bean drink’-PUR-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘contain via gravity/basin’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-SIZ2/3-SSD1/2
+ ‘coffee cup’
+
knul uçmè’ol
+ IFL-‘snake’-OBL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    FML-‘pet/domestic animal’-CRS-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘pet snake’
+
ūstala pta’ël
+ FML-‘wall of room’-OBL-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    ‘wood’-CPS-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘wooden wall’
+
Axmüùl uđo’äàh dupfā.
+ IFL-‘virus’-IND-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    FML-‘drink of water’-MED-DEL/M/CSL/AGG   IFL-‘(self-)directed motion’-PRX/N/VAR/UNI
+ ‘The virus spreads via the drinking water.’
+
uru’äliòn
+ FML-‘prepared/cooked food’-CSD-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-AGC2/2
+ ‘according to the cook’
+
lásk sëé’ikf
+ IFL-‘voice’-PRX/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘piece of music’-ASI-PRX/N/CSL/UNI
+ ‘a voice like music’
+
Yadálarai gmièl ăkšë’ul.
+ DIR-IFL-‘nickname/label’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-NA11/5-FNC/FAC    IFL-‘male child’-AFF    ‘nerd’-ESS-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘Don't call the boy a nerd.’
+
átalňa sfueis
+ IFL-‘page of writing’-OBL-DEL/M/COA/SEG    ‘porcupine’-REF-DEL/N/CSL/UNI
+ ‘a book about porcupines’
+
kpiĕul
+ IFL-‘extent of spatial length’-CLA-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ ‘lengthwise’
+

+ Stems/Roots for above examples:
+
ukya- ‘coffee bean drink ’ < kya- ‘COFFEE PLANT’
+ vlô- ‘contain via gravity/basin’ < vlô- ‘HOLD/CONTAIN/CONTENTS’
+ knu- ‘snake’ < knu- ‘SNAKE’
+ ùçme- ‘pet land/air animal’ <mè- ‘CLASSES OF ANIMAL’
+ ūsta(la)- ‘wall of room’ < stū- ‘HOLDING AREA/ENCLOSURE’
+ pta- ‘wood(en)’ < pa- ‘BRANCHED OR LEAVED PLANT’
+ axmù- ‘virus’ < kmù- ‘LOWER-ORDER LIFE-FORM’
+ uđò- ‘water as nourishment/drink (of) water ’ < đò- ‘WATER AS SUBSTANCE’
+ adū- ‘self-directed motion ’ < dū- ‘TRANSLATIVE MOTION ’
+ urà- ‘prepared/cooked food’ < rà- ‘NUTRITIONAL CONSUMPTION ’
+ lá- ‘voice’ < lá- ‘VOCAL/VERBAL SOUND ’
+ sé- ‘piece of music’ < sé- ‘MUSIC’
+ áda(la)- ‘nickname’ < dá- ‘NAME/TITLE/APPELLATION’
+ agmè- ‘male child’ < kmè- ‘FAMILY MEMBER’
+ ăkšu(la)- ‘nerd’ <kšŭ- ‘FOOL/BUFFOON’
+ áta(la)- ‘page of writing’ < tá- ‘WRITE/INSCRIBE/RECORD’
+ sfu- ‘porcupine’ < sfu- ‘PORCUPINE’
+ kpĕ- ‘extent/amount of spatial length ’ < kĕ- ‘LONG/LENGTH’
+
+
+

+

+ + + + +

4.6 THE TEMPORAL CASES

The temporal cases deal with contexts relating to time. In + many respects, Ilaksh analyzes time similarly to Western languages, particularly + in the ability to spatially compartmentalize time as seen in such English phrases + as ‘in 3 hours,’ ‘for 5 years,’ ‘day by day,’ + and ‘per month,’ as well as in analyzing time as progressively linear + using concepts such as ‘before,’ ‘after,’ ‘during,’ + ‘until,’ and ‘ago.’ The fifteen temporal cases are the SIMULTANEITIVE, + ASSESSIVE, CONCURSIVE, ACCESSIVE, DIFFUSIVE, PERIODIC, PROLAPSIVE, PRECURSIVE, + POSTCURSIVE, ELAPSIVE, ALLAPSIVE, INTERPOLATIVE, EPISODIC, PROLIMITIVE, and LIMITATIVE. Following are explanations + of the function and usage of each case. Actual Ilaksh examples of these cases + in use are provided in Sec. 4.6.16.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.1

SML

The Simultaneitive Case

The SIMULTANEITIVE case is marked by + Series 52 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The SIMULTANEITIVE identifies a noun + signifying a time period simultaneous to the act, state, or event under discussion. + Examples would be I was in class at the same time as his accident, + I worked a side-job concurrent to the strike, She laughed simultaneously + with my coughing fit.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.2

ASS

The Assessive Case

The ASSESSIVE case is marked by Series + 53 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ASSESSIVE specifies the unit of + time by which a contextual ratio of measurement is created, corresponding to + English ‘by’ or ‘per.’ Examples would be My lawyer + charges by the minute, He publishes several books each + year, The clown drove the fun-mobile at 90 miles per hour.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.3

CNR

The Concursive Case

The CONCURSIVE case is marked by Series + 54 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The CONCURSIVE serves as a “temporal + locative” signifying the beginning and ending boundaries of time during + or at which an act, state, or event occurs, the whole of which being considered + a single contextual situation. Examples of usage would be He prays during + lunch, She studied hard last night, I won’t + visit until then (i.e., during that period in time).

+
+

+

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.4

ACS

The Accessive Case

The ACCESSIVE case is marked by Series + 55 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The is similar to the CONCURSIVE, except + that the time identified is specific to a single moment or a brief, highly delimited + period seen in context as one moment, i.e., the point in time at which something + occurs. Examples of usage would be Dinner will be served at sunset; When (i.e., at the moment that) you hear his voice, + call in the clowns; Upon impact, both cars were accelerating.

+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.5

DFF

The Diffusive Case

The DIFFUSIVE case is marked by Series + 56 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The DIFFUSIVE is yet another temporal + locative similar to the CONCURSIVE, except that the time + period identified does not have explicit boundaries, only being centered on + the period identified by the noun. It is best expressed by the English phrase + ‘during the time surrounding….’ Examples of usage would be Most cars had tail fins in those days; I was abroad during + that era; At the time of his death, the number of + clowns was increasing; Over the past several seasons, your + talent has matured.

+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.6

PER

The Periodic Case

The PERIODIC case is marked by Series + 57 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PERIODIC identifies the span of + time at some point(s) during which, an act, condition, or event occurs. This + case should be distinguished from the CONCURSIVE above, + in that the periodic specifies a time frame in which separate events, repetitions, + or durationally extended acts or states take place, whereas the concursive signifies + a contextually single holistic event. Examples would be He wrote the novel in six months, These clowns can corrupt your child within + a few days, The woman has been ill a lot this year, For the last several concerts, my voice has been deteriorating.

+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.7

PRO

The Prolapsive Case

The PROLAPSIVE case is marked by Series + 58 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PROLAPSIVE signifies the duration + of an act, condition, or event, i.e., how long it takes or lasts. This case + should be distinguished from the PERIODIC above, in that + the PROLAPSIVE specifies the actual duration of the act, + condition, or event, whereas the PERIODIC merely specifies + a contextual span of time at some point(s) during which, an act, condition, + or event occurs. Examples would be He prayed through lunch, While he was dying, the number of clowns increased, It rained all night, It took three days for the fever + to break, She sang for an hour.

+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.8

PCV

The Precursive Case

The PRECURSIVE case is marked by Series + 59 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PRECURSIVE identifies a point in + time prior to which an act, condition, or event occurs. Examples would be This + situation occurred before the war, It rained prior + to his appearance, There will be a presentation preceding the + banquet.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.9

PCR

The Postcursive Case

The POSTCURSIVE case is marked by Series + 60 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The POSTCURSIVE identifies a point + in time after which an act, condition, or event occurs. Examples would be This + situation occurred after the war, It rained subsequent + to his appearance, There will be a presentation following the + banquet.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.10

ELP

The Elapsive Case

The ELAPSIVE case is marked by Series + 61 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ELAPSIVE identifies the amount + of time that has passed between the contextual present and the time of the act, + condition, or event being spoken of. It corresponds to English ‘…ago.’ + Examples would be Four years ago I was a student; Going + back three generations, women could not even vote.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.11

ALP

The Allapsive Case

The ALLAPSIVE case is marked by Series + 62 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ALLAPSIVE identifies the amount + of time that expected to pass between the contextual present and the time of + a future act, condition, or event. Examples would be Four years + from now, I will be a student; Looking ahead three generations, + clowns will rule the world; I will be home in three days; Little + did he know that two months later he’d be a rich man.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.12

INP

The Interpolative Case

The INTERPOLATIVE case is marked by Series + 63 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The INTERPOLATIVE is used within the + context of repetitive or iterative acts, states, and events and signifies the + duration of each repetition. Examples of usage are We heard several five-second snippets of music; Between lightning bursts were intervals of several + seconds; She gets recurring migraines, each lasting hours.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.13

EPS

The Episodic Case

The EPISODIC case is marked by Series + 64 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The EPISODIC identifies a contextually + recurring time-period. Examples of usage are The man talks with his mother every three days; Each year, I travel to the + Clown Planet; He works nights; By day, she + is an artisan; The clowns visit us on Sundays.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.14

PRL

The Prolimitive Case

The PROLIMITIVE case is marked by Series + 65 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PROLIMITIVE defines a point in + time which signifies a temporal limit to further contextual activity, i.e., + the time by which some act, state, or event occurs. Examples of usage would + be By the time of your graduation, I want you out of the + house; Please be on board by midnight; By the time + of the raid, there was nothing left to steal.

+ + + + + + + +

4.6.15

LIM

The Limitative Case

The LIMITATIVE case is marked by Series + 66 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The LIMITATIVE signifies a event culminating + an anticipatory context. It translates the English expression ‘in time + for.’ Examples of usage are He arrived in time for dinner, + Be inside the Big Tent in time for the clowns.

+
LISTEN
+
šóyel kī’al
+ IFL-‘three’-ALP-DEL/M/CSL/UNI     IFL-‘day (24-hr. period)’-PAR-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ three days from now
+
tayùpla roi
+ IFL-‘life’-PRL-TRM/M/CSL/UNI     ma-ATT
+ by the time of his death
+
ukiyogīnnuik
+ FML-‘day (24-hr. period)’-EPS-DEL/M/COA/DCT-SEQ1/1-SBS2/9
+ on Sundays
+
Šówol kī ’al žìrskukt tia.
+ IFL-‘three’-PRO-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-‘day (24-hr. period)’-PAR-DEL/M/CSL/UNI     IFL-OPR-‘article of clothing’-PRX/M/CSL/AGG-DEF1/9   1m-IND
+ I’ve been (deliberately) wearing these clothes for three days.
+
krûwösk žoi
+ IFL-‘grief’-PCR-PRX/M/CSL/UNI     1m+2u+ua-ATT
+ after our period of grief
+

+ Stems/Roots for above examples:
+
šó- ‘three’ < šó-‘THREE’
+ kī- ‘day (= 24-hour period)’ < kī- ‘DAY (24-HOUR PERIOD)’
+ tà- ‘life/living being’ < tà- ‘LIFE/ALIVE/LIVING BEING ’
+ žì- ‘article of clothing ’ <žì- ‘CLOTHE/CLOTHING/FASHION’
+ krû- ‘grief/sadness from (a) loss’ < krû- ‘GRIEF/SADNESS FROM (A) LOSS’
+

+ _____

+ + + + +

4.7 THE SPATIAL CASES

As noted previously, prepositions do not exist in Ilaksh. + While various non-Indo-European languages such as Finnish, Hungarian, Basque + and the North Caucasian languages accomplish the equivalent of prepositional + relationships using noun cases, such relationships are usually accomplished + in Ilaksh via verbal formatives (e.g., a verb translatable as ‘to be + inside of’ instead of a preposition ‘inside of’). Nevertheless, + there are six cases corresponding to certain types of spatial relationships. + These are the LOCATIVE, ORIENTATIVE, PROCURSIVE, ALLATIVE, ABLATIVE, + and NAVIGATIVE.

Also: see Section 4.5.25 above regarding the use of the CORRELATIVE case in sentences involving spatial direction or orientation.

Following are explanations of the function + and usage of each case. Actual Ilaksh examples of these cases in use are provided + in Sec. 4.7.7.

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.1

LOC

The Locative Case

The LOCATIVE case is marked by Series + 67 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The LOCATIVE signifies general static + position in the same contextual place as the specified location, translatable + by many English prepositions such as ‘at,’ ‘in,’ ‘on,’ + or ‘by,’ depending on the context, e.g., in that building, by + the wall, on the street, at my house.
+
+
+

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.2

ORI

The Orientative Case

The ORIENTATIVE case is marked by Series + 68 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The ORIENTATIVE identifies the noun + (usually a subcomponent or body part) which serves as the forward “end” + of a spatially orientated axis aligned to a vector of motion. This is translatable + into English using elements such as ‘-ward(s)’ or ‘-first’ + in conjunction with portions of objects in a spatio-orientational context, e.g., He jumped in feet-first, The car rolled backward. + The ORIENTATIVE allows for the extension of this concept + to contexts which seem awkward in English translation, e.g., He walked “butt-ward” + down the street (i.e., backward with his butt protruding frontwards, leading + the way).

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.3

PSV

The Procursive Case

The PROCURSIVE case is marked by Series + 69 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The PROCURSIVE identifies a noun (often + a subcomponent or body part) which serves as the orientational reference point, + interactional surface or interface relative to the direction of interaction + with, or position in space of, a second noun. This second noun usually appears + in the ALLATIVE case (see below). Examples of use would be They + collided sideways, She turned her back on + him, The chair “faced” the doorway (i.e., + The chair stood with it’s seat and back aligned toward the doorway).

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.4

ALL

The Allative Case

The ALLATIVE case is marked by Series + 70 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). When used in the context of explicit or implied directional + motion, the ALLATIVE signifies the direction of motion, + translatable by ‘to’ or ‘toward(s)’ or the suffix ‘-ward(s)’ + in English. Note that the ALLATIVE in no way implies that + the object is intended as the final or intended destination or goal of the motion + or movement, only the direction of the movement. Examples would be I wandered eastward, The little girl ran toward me, Throw + the rock at that clown!, We headed for home.

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.5

ABL

The Ablative Case

The ABLATIVE case is marked by Series + 71 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). When used in context of explicit or implied directional motion, + the ABLATIVE signifies the general directional origin + of movement away from or out of. It does not specify the actual point of origin + or departure. Examples would be He came out of the east, + She walked here from (the direction of) the river.

When used in contexts where directional motion is not implied, + the ABLATIVE signifies a reverse directional orientation + of one noun relative to another, e.g., He faced away from me.

+ + + + + + + +

4.7.6

NAV

The Navigative Case

The NAVIGATIVE case is marked by Series + 72 mutation of the stem vowel (see Section 2.5). The NAVIGATIVE identifies the noun + relative to whose vector, arc, or trajectory of motion an act, state, or event + takes place. This is particularly important, as we will see in Section + 10.4.3 that Ilaksh modes of positional reference are tied into the vectors + of movement or the configurational axes of objects in the environment such as + the sun or the length of a room. Example uses would be I looked down + the street, We aligned it perpendicular to the path of the + sun, He crossed the room diagonally (i.e., walked + diagonally relative to the long axis of the room.)

4.1 Semantic Role versus Positional Slot

4.5 The Associative Cases

4.2 Morpho-Phonological Markers for Case

4.6 The Temporal Cases

4.3 The Transrelative Cases

4.7 The Spatial Cases

4.4 The Possessive Cases

+
LISTEN
+
zmäāwal
+ IFL-‘valley’-LOC-DEL/M/CSL/UNI
+ in the valley
+
Żgàwül đđulīmsërt rua.
+ IFL-‘head’-ORI-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    IFL-OPR-‘downward movement’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI-AGN1/1-PHY2/1    ma-AFF
+ He fell headfirst to his death.
+
Xàl tia zbřeyüūl.
+ IFL-‘see’-DEL/M/CSL/UNI    1m-IND    IFL-‘pathway’-NAV
+ I’m looking down the path.
+

+ Stems/Roots for above examples:
+
zmā- ‘valley’ < smā-‘ELEVATION OF TERRAIN/RELATIVE ALTITUDE OF GEOGRAPHIC FEATURE OR AREA ’
+ żgà- ‘head (as physical body part)’ < żà- ‘HEAD’
+ đđū- ‘downward movement/motion’ < đū- ‘VERTICAL (UPWARD/DOWNWARD) MOVEMENT/MOTION’
+ urà- ‘prepared/cooked food’ < rà- ‘NUTRITIONAL CONSUMPTION ’
+ xà- ‘see’ < xà- ‘VISION/SIGHT’
+ zbřē- ‘pathway’ < vrē- ‘COURSE/WAY’
+
+

+

+ Proceed to Chapter 5: Verb Morphology >>
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Home 4 Case Morphology 9 Syntax
Introduction 5 Verb Morphology 10 Lexico-Semantics
1 Phonology 6 More Verb Morphology. 11 The Writing System
2 Morpho-Phonology 7 Suffixes 12 The Number System
3 Basic Morphology 8 Adjuncts The Lexicon

+
©2007-2009 by John Quijada. You may copy or excerpt any portion of the contents of this website provided you give full attribution to the author and this website.
+

+
+

+ + -- cgit v1.2.3