From d2da853b9eb430679e7238b93996f8e4651a39c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: uakci
The first type of adjunct we will analyze are those relating - to personal reference. By personal reference is meant the grammatical + to personal reference. By âpersonal referenceâ is meant the grammatical description of nouns by abbreviated forms of reference. In most languages, this is accomplished by means of personal pronouns (e.g., English he, she, it, I, you, him, her, mine, ours, etc.). Generally, personal pronouns are distinguished - by person (1st, 2nd , or 3rd) and case (e.g., compare English + by âpersonâ (1st, 2nd , or 3rd) and case (e.g., compare English we, us, and ours). Ithkuil accomplishes the equivalent function by means of personal reference adjuncts, of which there are two types: single-referent and dual-referent.
@@ -171,10 +171,10 @@ additional types of adjuncts are introduced.8.1.1.1
Monadic vs. Unbounded. These terms were discussed in detail in Sec.
- 3.3 on Perspective. For simplicitys sake, the difference between
+ 3.3 on Perspective. For simplicityâs sake, the difference between
a MONADIC third party versus an UNBOUNDED
- third party can be thought of as the difference between he/she/it
- and they.
8.1.1.2
Speaker and Addressee. These terms refer respectively to the party
@@ -182,22 +182,22 @@ additional types of adjuncts are introduced.
From the viewpoint of Ithkuil grammar, only a single individual can speak. Even if there are two or more persons speaking the same utterance simultaneously it is but a collection of single individuals, each of which is - one speaker. Therefore, the first person of Ithkuil, the speaker, + one speaker. Therefore, the âfirst personâ of Ithkuil, the speaker, can be only MONADIC, never UNBOUNDED. - Thus, in Ithkuil, there is no true equivalent to the word we, - since inherent in the various categories which translate we is - the concept of I plus some other entity or entities. From this - we can begin to see how it is the idea of inclusion or exclusion in the speakers + Thus, in Ithkuil, there is no true equivalent to the word âwe,â + since inherent in the various categories which translate âweâ is + the concept of âI plus some other entity or entities.â From this + we can begin to see how it is the idea of inclusion or exclusion in the speakerâs utterance that determines the various personal reference categories.
-The second person in Ithkuil is the addressee, +
The âsecond personâ in Ithkuil is the addressee, the person(s) being addressed or spoken to. There can be one addressee, or more than one addressee, i.e., MONADIC or UNBOUNDED.
-The third person in Ithkuil is where things get +
The âthird personâ in Ithkuil is where things get very complicated, in that a party being referenced who is not the speaker or the addressee can have many distinctions, including the presence or absence of animacy, being MONADIC versus UNBOUNDED, @@ -213,18 +213,18 @@ additional types of adjuncts are introduced.
distinction between gender (he vs. she) found in most Western languages does not exist in the Ithkuil personal reference system.8.1.1.4
- Mixed Third-Party Reference. It is possible for the third
+ âMixedâ Third-Party Reference. It is possible for the third
party being referenced to be two or more entities of different natures. For
- example a speaker could make reference to I, you, and they where
- they consists of a group consisting of one person (i.e., a monadic
+ example a speaker could make reference to âI, you, and theyâ where
+ âtheyâ consists of a group consisting of one person (i.e., a monadic
animate entity), three boxes (i.e., a polyadic inanimate entity), and an intangible
- concept such as happiness (i.e., an abstract entity). In such
- cases, Ithkuil personal reference categories provide for such mixed
+ concept such as âhappinessâ (i.e., an abstract entity). In such
+ cases, Ithkuil personal reference categories provide for such âmixedâ
parties to be included in a particular personal referent.
8.1.1.5
Collective Reference. This corresponds to the NOMIC
Perspective in which a noun can be spoken of as a generic collective. For example,
- the word dog in the sentence The dog is a noble beast
+ the word âdogâ in the sentence The dog is a noble beast
refers to all dogs in a collective sense, not any dog in particular. This COLLECTIVE
category has its own set of personal reference affixes in Ithkuil, depending
on what other entities are included in the context of the utterance.
8.1.1.9
Universal Reference. This category indicates that the third party refers
to every third party within the specified parameters. For example, the referent
-l
- indicates a universal animate party, i.e., English everyone or
- everybody, while the referent -lŻ
+ indicates a universal animate party, i.e., English âeveryoneâ or
+ âeverybody,â while the referent -lĆ»
- indicates a universal inanimate party, i.e., English everything.
+ indicates a universal inanimate party, i.e., English âeverything.â
8.1.1.10
Impersonal Reference. This category corresponds to the German pronoun
man or French pronoun on, as well as the various circumlocutions
- used in English to describe impersonal reference (e.g., one, you,
- they, the passive voice, and certain usages of someone).
+ used in English to describe impersonal reference (e.g., âone,â âyou,â
+ âthey,â the passive voice, and certain usages of âsomeoneâ).
Such impersonal reference is illustrated in the following English sentences:
-· One should +
· One should never speak to clowns alone.
- · To dance the tango you need a partner.
- · They say it never rains in August.
- · That town is said to be haunted.
- · She just wants to talk to someone + · To dance the tango you need a partner.
+ · They say it never rains in August.
+ · That town is said to be haunted.
+ · She just wants to talk to someone without being criticized.
8.1.1.11 Inclusivity vs. Exclusivity. Since @@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ additional types of adjuncts are introduced.
addressee(s), and any third party is included or excluded in the context of the utterance, there are many possible personal reference distinctions possible in Ithkuil for which English has no equivalent pronouns. Such exacting distinctions - would have to be made periphrastically in English, e.g., instead of saying we, - the speaker would have to specify the two of us, or I and - he but not you, or I, you, and they. Similarly, the English - word you breaks down into specific meanings equivalent to you - (singular), you (plural), you (singular) and it, - you and those people, you and those things, etc. + would have to be made periphrastically in English, e.g., instead of saying âwe,â + the speaker would have to specify âthe two of us,â or âI and + he but not you,â or âI, you, and they.â Similarly, the English + word âyouâ breaks down into specific meanings equivalent to âyou + (singular),â âyou (plural),â âyou (singular) and it,â + âyou and those people,â âyou and those things,â etc.Adjuncts with one personal referent are termed single-referent @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ additional types of adjuncts are introduced.
=
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ for Personal Reference Adjuncts
renders the composite prefix sf-,
while the combination of the prefix t-
with the prefix q-
- gives the composite t-.
+ gives the composite tâ-.
Table 30 below illustrates how the 23 single-consonant prefixes combine with
each other.
Table 30: Personal Reference
@@ -852,16 +852,16 @@ for Personal Reference Adjuncts
composite prefixes from Table 30 under the following
circumstance: to show that two different parties are governed by the same case
and participate equally with the verb, equivalent to connecting two pronouns
- in English by and as in He and I went to the store or
- The man looked at them and me. Examples: ksauŻ,
- xnû,
+ in English by âandâ as in He and I went to the store or
+ The man looked at them and me. Examples: ksauĆ»,
+ xnƱ,
hhea
.
Note in the last example hhea
how the combination of a low-toned referent and a high-toned referent combines
to give a rising-toned adjunct.
8.1.3.2 Illustration of a Dual-Referent Adjunct:
Based on the above information, we can now analyze an example dual-referent
- adjunct diawàsmûç
:
-iaw- |
= |
- PROLATIVE case infix (meaning along [the - surface of] X) for Referent No. 1 | +PROLATIVE case infix (meaning âalong [the + surface of] Xâ) for Referent No. 1 |
-a- |
@@ -900,12 +900,12 @@ for Personal Reference Adjuncts |||
-û- |
+ -Ʊ- |
= |
VARIATIVE affiliation for Referent No. 2 |
-ç |
+ -ç |
= |
REACTIVE bias |
| -V2_ | +-V2_â | SWR |
Switch Reference & Obviative Specification |
Subsidiary adjuncts refer to adjuncts which are essentially
- subsets or pieces of the conflation adjunct first introduced in
+ subsets or âpiecesâ of the conflation adjunct first introduced in
Chapter 5. Conflation adjuncts comprise the morphological categories of Derivation,
Valence, Version, Format, Modality and Level, and are of the form CN
- + VV + CK + Vm [+ tone], exemplified by the word tuilliaŻ
- = t+ui+ll+ia+Ż.
+ + VV + CK + Vm [+ tone], exemplified by the word tâuilliaĆ»
+ = tâ+ui+ll+ia+Ć».
However, it is possible to take this same adjunct and present only select portions
of it. We already saw this in Sec. 5.2 when we were introduced to valence adjuncts,
- which are essentially composed of the VV + CK subset of a conflation
+ which are essentially composed of the VV + CK âsubsetâ of a conflation
adjunct. Similarly we can have simple modality adjuncts of the form Vm
- [+ tone] as in the word iaŻ which also shows
+ [+ tone] as in the word iaĆ» which also shows
the category of Level (via the tone indication). A simple format adjunct is
possible by simply using CK by itself as a word, e.g., ll.
To this can be added the Vm [+ tone] increment to provide a
- subsidiary adjunct showing Format, Modality and Level, as in lliaŻ.
Example: oweiç
.
Example: oweiç
.
Table 33: Vj
Format + Level Vocalic Infixes for Combination Adjuncts
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ for Personal Reference Adjuncts
forms of the Format/Focus infix from Table 33 above are now used to indicate
affix-type instead of Level.
Examples: psiyoul,
- juwämm.
+ juwĂ€âmm.
|
+ â |
a- |
i- |
e- |
u- |
o- |
- ö- |
- ë- |
- ä- |
+ ö- |
+ Ă«- |
+ À- |
To illustrate this process for the
- two example adjuncts
iua
- and vëukt,
- adding Series B and Series G mutation respectively results in the forms a
iua
+ two example adjuncts
âiuâa
+ and vĂ«ââukt,
+ adding Series B and Series G mutation respectively results in the forms a
âiuâa
and
- övëukt. Illustrating the process
- for conflation adjuncts, the adjunct puim
û
- plus Series C mutation becomes ipuim
û.
| Revised Ithkuil: Ilaksh |
©2004-2009 by John Quijada. You may copy or excerpt any portion
+ ©2004-2009 by John Quijada. You may copy or excerpt any portion
of the contents of this website provided you give full attribution to the author
and this website.